It began with one generator.
Lonnie bought a Pulsar PGDA70BiSCO on April 10 for $1,099.57. The purchase record is the starting point for this case.
Purchase record / E02Pulsar PGDA70BiSCO / A documented warranty dispute
Lonnie sent the requested parts list. Pulsar requires an inspection before authorizing warranty parts. The outstanding question is where to take the generator.
A public record by Lonnie Barkby / BBB complaint #25096048
Since replacement problems were reported
May 10, 2026 at 12:11 PM Central. Email in E01, p. 21. Seconds indicate elapsed time, not live case monitoring.
Since Pulsar's documented BBB response
--calendar daysFrom August 5, 2026, using the Central calendar date. No exact response time is available.
Read that responseFollow the record
From the purchase to the unanswered repair-location request. Each step links to its source.
01 / 12 Purchase
Read at your own pace. No automatic scrolling.
Lonnie bought a Pulsar PGDA70BiSCO on April 10 for $1,099.57. The purchase record is the starting point for this case.
Purchase record / E02After reporting that it stopped starting, Lonnie returned the original generator under Pulsar's authorization. Pulsar confirmed a replacement shipment on July 22.
Return and replacement / E01, pp. 11-20Lonnie reported failed electric and remote start, a broken pull handle and cracked housing. He sent the requested test results on May 17. That record lists 203.2 total hours.
Report and tests / E01, pp. 21-22Roy sent the 27-page parts diagram and wrote, "Please review it and let me know exactly what part numbers you require so I can send them out to you."
Roy's request / E01, p. 25Lonnie supplied a parts list, separating repair needs from additional spares. He also noted part-number discrepancies in the diagram.
Submitted parts list / E05Lonnie escalated after 22 days without a reply to his parts list. Tom Irwin said he would rather deal with the case on BBB's platform and that this would delay resolution. The full quotation and context are below.
Tom Irwin's response and contextThe complaint was filed July 27. Pulsar's July 28 response said it required an inspection report from a qualified repair facility before authorizing warranty parts.
Pulsar's July 28 responsePulsar said it would work to identify a facility after Lonnie replied to Josh's email. Lonnie asked to continue through BBB and again requested the repair location.
Read both sides of the BBB exchangeThe public record includes an exchange about outreach, legal claims and the unresolved warranty request. Those claims are the senders' statements, not findings by this site.
Read the reproduced email exchangeLonnie asked BBB for assistance, a written case status and consideration of mediation before closure. The September 8 form displayed a sent confirmation.
Follow-ups and submission confirmationLonnie asked why his earlier requests and request for mediation remained unanswered. He again requested an approved shop name and a case manager or supervisor. BBB's form confirmed the submission, not a staff response.
Read the message sent to BBBBBB said coordination with Josh must precede mediation eligibility review. Lonnie asked why the facility information could not be obtained through BBB.
Read the latest emailsLatest exchange / September 22, 2026
BBB said direct coordination with Josh must precede review for mediation eligibility. Lonnie asked why BBB could not obtain the facility information and requested confirmation that the complaint would remain open.
Read both emailsTake part
AI tools assisted with organizing records, redacting private information, drafting summaries, and building this site. Lonnie Barkby reviewed the published content and remains responsible for it. Reasonable efforts were made to match every factual statement to the available record, but AI and people can make mistakes.
Anyone may identify disputed content and provide supporting information through the correction form below. Each request will be reviewed against the source record. Confirmed factual errors will be corrected, and information that should not be public may be removed.
No submissions are posted automatically. This site collects accounts for review; it does not enroll people in a class action.
Go deeper