Pulsar PGDA70BiSCO / A documented warranty dispute

The parts list was sent.
The repair shop name is still missing.

Lonnie sent the requested parts list. Pulsar requires an inspection before authorizing warranty parts. The outstanding question is where to take the generator.

A public record by Lonnie Barkby   /   BBB complaint #25096048

Since replacement problems were reported

May 10, 2026 at 12:11 PM Central. Email in E01, p. 21. Seconds indicate elapsed time, not live case monitoring.

Since Pulsar's documented BBB response

--calendar days

From August 5, 2026, using the Central calendar date. No exact response time is available.

Read that response

Follow the record

How it got here.

From the purchase to the unanswered repair-location request. Each step links to its source.

01 / 12 Purchase

Jump to the latest

Read at your own pace. No automatic scrolling.

  1. It began with one generator.

    Lonnie bought a Pulsar PGDA70BiSCO on April 10 for $1,099.57. The purchase record is the starting point for this case.

    Purchase record / E02
  2. The first unit went back.

    After reporting that it stopped starting, Lonnie returned the original generator under Pulsar's authorization. Pulsar confirmed a replacement shipment on July 22.

    Return and replacement / E01, pp. 11-20
  3. Problems with the replacement.

    Lonnie reported failed electric and remote start, a broken pull handle and cracked housing. He sent the requested test results on May 17. That record lists 203.2 total hours.

    Report and tests / E01, pp. 21-22
  4. Pulsar asked for part numbers.

    Roy sent the 27-page parts diagram and wrote, "Please review it and let me know exactly what part numbers you require so I can send them out to you."

    Roy's request / E01, p. 25
  5. The requested list was sent.

    Lonnie supplied a parts list, separating repair needs from additional spares. He also noted part-number discrepancies in the diagram.

    Submitted parts list / E05
  6. The exchange reached a vice president.

    Lonnie escalated after 22 days without a reply to his parts list. Tom Irwin said he would rather deal with the case on BBB's platform and that this would delay resolution. The full quotation and context are below.

    Tom Irwin's response and context
  7. The complaint moved to BBB.

    The complaint was filed July 27. Pulsar's July 28 response said it required an inspection report from a qualified repair facility before authorizing warranty parts.

    Pulsar's July 28 response
  8. One question remained. Which shop?

    Pulsar said it would work to identify a facility after Lonnie replied to Josh's email. Lonnie asked to continue through BBB and again requested the repair location.

    Read both sides of the BBB exchange
  9. Further emails with Tom Irwin.

    The public record includes an exchange about outreach, legal claims and the unresolved warranty request. Those claims are the senders' statements, not findings by this site.

    Read the reproduced email exchange
  10. Two direct requests for BBB help.

    Lonnie asked BBB for assistance, a written case status and consideration of mediation before closure. The September 8 form displayed a sent confirmation.

    Follow-ups and submission confirmation
  11. A third request for BBB staff assistance.

    Lonnie asked why his earlier requests and request for mediation remained unanswered. He again requested an approved shop name and a case manager or supervisor. BBB's form confirmed the submission, not a staff response.

    Read the message sent to BBB
  12. BBB replied. Lonnie asked for the next step.

    BBB said coordination with Josh must precede mediation eligibility review. Lonnie asked why the facility information could not be obtained through BBB.

    Read the latest emails
Open the detailed event index
  1. Generator purchased. The Amazon record lists the Pulsar generator at $1,099.57. Evidence E02
  2. First generator returned. Lonnie documented shipping the unit under Pulsar's return authorization and a receipt for $86.44 in packing materials. Evidence E01, pages 11-12
  3. Pulsar confirmed the replacement shipment. Pulsar's email gave a July 24 estimated delivery date. Evidence E01, page 20
  4. Problems with the replacement were reported. The email described failed electric and remote start, a broken recoil handle, and cracked housing. Evidence E01, page 21
  5. Requested test results were sent. The record lists battery voltage, no voltage drop during the start attempt, charging readings, and 203.2 run hours. Evidence E01, page 22
  6. Pulsar requested exact part numbers. Roy sent a 27-page diagram and asked Lonnie to identify the parts required. Evidence E01, page 25
  7. The requested parts list was sent. It separated repair parts from additional spare-part requests and noted discrepancies in Pulsar's diagram. Evidence E05
  8. Lonnie escalated after 22 days without a reply. The email asked for shipment confirmation and stated that a BBB complaint would follow if none arrived by Friday. Evidence E01, page 29
  9. Tom Irwin responded. The preceding email includes the BBB quotation reproduced below. On July 23, he wrote, "I am withdrawing my assistance." Evidence E01, pages 30 and 33
  10. A new Pulsar thread began. Joshua asked for the model number and wrote that he did not have access to any other email chain. Evidence E01, page 34
  11. BBB complaint filed. BBB assigned complaint #25096048 and forwarded it to Pulsar. BBB record
  12. Pulsar sent its latest documented BBB response. Pulsar again requested coordination through Josh before identifying a repair facility. Lonnie replied through BBB the same day. Read the public transcript
  13. BBB staff replied and Lonnie answered. Jessica said the case was ready for closure. Lonnie renewed his request for mediation and an approved repair facility. Read the email exchange
  14. BBB described a condition for mediation review. Lonnie asked why direct coordination with Josh was necessary to obtain a facility name. Read the email exchange

Latest exchange / September 22, 2026

Still asking for a repair location.

BBB said direct coordination with Josh must precede review for mediation eligibility. Lonnie asked why BBB could not obtain the facility information and requested confirmation that the complaint would remain open.

Read both emails

Take part

Follow the case or share yours.

Get email updates
Share a Pulsar complaint privately

Submit a Pulsar complaint privately

Tell me what happened and what records you have. I am collecting documented complaints to determine whether there may be grounds for a class action lawsuit.

Submitting information does not create an attorney-client relationship or make anyone part of a class action. Your complaint comes only to me, Lonnie Barkby. It will not be published or voluntarily shared with anyone else. I may contact you directly at the email you provide. Information would be disclosed without your permission only if required by law. The services that host and secure this site process the submission so the form can operate.

See something inaccurate? Request a correction or removal.

Accuracy and correction policy

AI tools assisted with organizing records, redacting private information, drafting summaries, and building this site. Lonnie Barkby reviewed the published content and remains responsible for it. Reasonable efforts were made to match every factual statement to the available record, but AI and people can make mistakes.

Anyone may identify disputed content and provide supporting information through the correction form below. Each request will be reviewed against the source record. Confirmed factual errors will be corrected, and information that should not be public may be removed.

Request a correction or removal

If you believe something on this site is inaccurate or should not be public, identify it and explain why. Supporting records or a link to them will help with the review.

The request and supporting information will be reviewed privately and will not be published automatically. Submitting a request does not guarantee that documented material will be changed or removed.

No submissions are posted automatically. This site collects accounts for review; it does not enroll people in a class action.

Go deeper

Read the record.

Case background

The issue in four steps

A parts request.
An inspection requirement.
A missing location.

These records show where the process changed. They do not establish a diagnosis or a legal finding about the warranty.

  1. 01June 18

    Pulsar sent the diagram.

    Support asked Lonnie to identify the exact parts he needed.

    Read the request
  2. 02June 30

    Lonnie sent the list.

    The list distinguished repair parts from extra spares.

    See the parts list
  3. 03July 28 / August 5

    Pulsar required inspection.

    The company said symptoms and a parts list were not a qualified diagnosis.

    Read Pulsar's position
  4. 04Still requested

    Which approved shop?

    Lonnie asked through BBB. He reports that the name is still missing.

    Read Lonnie's request
The point of disagreement

Pulsar asked Lonnie to reply directly to Josh so they could identify a facility. Lonnie asked to keep the case in BBB and requested the location there. Read the exchange in context.

Emails and dated updates

The written record

Updates, with the messages behind them

September 22, 2026 / BBB reply and Lonnie's response

BBB set a condition for mediation review. Lonnie asked why.

BBB said direct coordination with Josh must precede review for mediation eligibility. Lonnie asked why BBB could not obtain the facility information and requested confirmation that the complaint would remain open.

The emails do not confirm mediation eligibility, an agreement to keep the complaint open or an approved repair facility. Lonnie's reply describes his own feelings and position.

These are the email bodies, with BBB staff surnames, private contact details, private location information, signature links and older quoted history omitted. Jessica refers to a July 31 response; the separate portal response reproduced below is dated August 5. These dates have not been reconciled.

Jessica, BBB, to LonnieSeptember 22, 2026

Received at 10:26 AM Central / 11:26 AM Eastern. Subject Re: Message from BBB.org.

Lonnie to Jessica, BBBSeptember 22, 2026

Sent at 11:46 AM Central / 12:46 PM Eastern. Subject Re: Message from BBB.org. Sending is confirmed; reading by BBB is not.

September 21, 2026 / BBB staff reply and Lonnie's response

BBB replied. Lonnie renewed his request for mediation.

Jessica, a BBB Conciliation & Engagement Specialist, said the complaint had completed BBB's dispute resolution process and was ready for closure. She asked whether Lonnie had replied to Josh or contacted him to locate a repair shop. She attributed the delayed staff response to an unmonitored inbox.

Lonnie replied the same evening. He described his July 23 and August 5 replies to Josh, renewed his request for mediation, and asked BBB to keep the complaint open while obtaining the name of an approved repair facility from Pulsar.

What is confirmed. Jessica's email was received and Lonnie's reply was sent in the same conversation. The exchange does not confirm that the complaint has closed, that BBB agreed to keep it open, that mediation was arranged or that a repair facility was identified. The BBB portal was not rechecked.

The email bodies are reproduced below. BBB staff last names, private contact details, signature links and older quoted history are omitted. Punctuation in Jessica's email is normalized; its wording is preserved.

Jessica, BBB, to LonnieSeptember 21, 2026

Received. 2:28 PM Central / 3:28 PM Eastern. Subject Re: Message from BBB.org.

Lonnie to Jessica, BBBSeptember 21, 2026

Sent. 9:09 PM Central / 10:09 PM Eastern. Subject Re: Message from BBB.org. Sending is confirmed; reading by BBB is not.

September 19, 2026 / Third direct request to BBB

Asking for a person to review the case.

After reporting no reply to his August 19 and September 8 requests, Lonnie sent another message through BBB, Mountain West & Pacific Southwest's official contact form. He asked why those requests and his request for mediation remained unanswered, and requested a case manager or dispute-resolution supervisor.

Submission confirmed. The browser displayed "Your message was successfully sent to the BBB, Mountain West & Pacific Southwest". That confirmation was observed on September 19 at 4:21 PM Central. It confirms an accepted form submission, not that a staff member read the message or added it to the complaint record.

Three direct requests to BBB are now recorded, on August 19, September 8 and September 19. The latest message is reproduced below with the complaint number omitted from its opening line. No email address or other private contact details are included.

Lonnie Barkby to BBBSeptember 19, 2026

Delivery. BBB regional contact form

September 19, 2026 / Record review

The repair-shop name remains the outstanding request.

Lonnie reports that Pulsar has not provided the name of an approved repair shop. A mailbox search on September 19 found no newer email from BBB or Pulsar after September 8. This is an email check, not a fresh check of the BBB portal.

At the time of this earlier review, the two recorded direct messages to BBB were dated August 19 and September 8. A third message was subsequently sent on September 19 and is reproduced above. Submission confirmations do not establish that BBB added a message to the complaint record or that a case manager reviewed it.

See the last verified portal status
September 8 / Second request for BBB assistance

Second direct BBB follow-up sent September 8

After receiving no reply to the August 19 contact-form message, Lonnie sent BBB another request for the current written status, a contact channel for the assigned case manager, another written response from Pulsar, and consideration of mediation before the complaint is closed.

BBB's form displayed a confirmation that the message was successfully sent to BBB, Mountain West & Pacific Southwest. No written response from BBB had been received when this page was updated on September 8, 2026.

BBB confirmation stating that the message was successfully sent to BBB, Mountain West and Pacific Southwest
Submission confirmation shown by BBB on September 8, 2026. Select the image to open the full-size copy.

The complete September 8 message appears below. The complaint number is omitted from the reproduced text.

Lonnie Barkby to BBBSeptember 8, 2026

Delivery. BBB direct contact form

August 19 / First direct request to BBB

August 19 follow-up sent directly to BBB

The complaint portal showed that BBB was reviewing the matter. Lonnie found no case-message option displayed in the portal, so he used BBB's direct contact form to ask that the following message be routed to the assigned case manager and added to the existing complaint record.

Delivery. Sent through BBB's contact form on August 19, 2026. Lonnie asked BBB to confirm receipt and placement in the case record. No confirmation of placement in the case record was found in the email review on September 19.

The text below is Lonnie's message to BBB with the complaint number removed. Its legal statements and conclusions are presented as his words, not as independent conclusions by this site.

Lonnie Barkby to BBBAugust 19, 2026

Delivery. BBB direct contact form

August 18 / Direct email exchange with Tom Irwin

August 18 email exchange added

The email thread below began after Lonnie emailed Popular Mechanics about its Pulsar recommendation and copied Pulsar representatives. This section includes the first five messages from that exchange.

Last message reproduced in this section. Tom Irwin at 3:48 PM Central on August 18, 2026.

Recipient addresses and repeated quoted message history are omitted. The original message bodies are reproduced below. Legal statements are presented as the sender's words, not as conclusions by this site.

1. Lonnie Barkby to Popular Mechanics, Pulsar copiedAugust 18, 2026 at 2:42 PM CT

Subject: Your Pulsar recommendation and one owner's complete warranty record

2. Tom Irwin repliesAugust 18, 2026 at 2:54 PM CT

Subject: Re: Your Pulsar recommendation and one owner's complete warranty record

3. Lonnie Barkby repliesAugust 18, 2026 at 3:37 PM CT

Subject: Re: Your Pulsar recommendation and one owner's complete warranty record

4. Tom Irwin repliesAugust 18, 2026 at 3:48 PM CT

Subject: Re: Your Pulsar recommendation and one owner's complete warranty record

5. Lonnie Barkby repliesDraft completed August 18, 2026 at 4:54 PM CT

Status: Sent after Lonnie's final review.

Subject: Re: Your Pulsar recommendation and one owner's complete warranty record

BBB exchange and case status

Better Business Bureau

BBB Complaint #25096048

Latest documented exchange, September 22, 2026. BBB said direct coordination with Josh must precede review for mediation eligibility. Lonnie asked why BBB could not obtain the facility information and requested confirmation that the complaint would remain open.

Lonnie renewed his mediation request and asked BBB to confirm that the complaint would remain open until Pulsar supplied the facility information. Read both September 22 emails.

The outstanding request. Where does Pulsar want Lonnie to take the generator? The September 22 exchange does not confirm a repair facility, arranged mediation or BBB's agreement to keep the complaint open. It also does not confirm that the complaint has closed.

BBB staff are identified by first name only throughout this public record.

Earlier portal checks and requests for assistance

Historical portal wording. "BBB is reviewing this matter." BBB also displayed, "There is no action for you to take at this time. We will contact you when we next require your input." This was checked on September 8, 2026. It is an older observation, not a current portal check.

Before the September 21 reply, three requests for BBB assistance were recorded on August 19, September 8 and September 19. Read the September 19 request. The earlier September 8 submission confirmation remains available.

Complaint #25096048 did not appear in BBB's public complaint list when checked on August 20, 2026. That observation is historical. BBB says the complaint text it displays might not represent every complaint filed. The reason this complaint was absent was unknown; the observation does not establish that Pulsar or BBB hid it.

Pulsar Products Inc. public BBB profile / BBB's public complaint list and publication notice

This is Lonnie Barkby's independently maintained case record, not an official BBB publication. The original complaint and correspondence include their authors' opinions. The summaries here describe the available evidence.

July 28 business response through BBB

Public transcript with contact details removed.

Pulsar Products appreciates the opportunity to respond to this complaint. We regret the customer's frustration and remain committed to honoring the applicable warranty in accordance with its terms.

The customer states that the generator is experiencing multiple failures, including the electric start system, charging system, recoil starter, housing damage, and other components. Based on the number and nature of the reported issues, it is not possible to accurately determine which parts have actually failed without a qualified inspection.

Under Pulsar's limited warranty, a parts warranty does not mean replacement parts are provided solely upon request or based on a customer-generated parts list. The warranty covers replacement of parts that are determined to have failed due to defects in materials or workmanship. Before warranty parts can be authorized, we require an inspection report from a qualified repair facility identifying the defective components and the recommended repair plan. This allows us to provide the correct warranty parts.

We appreciate the time spent preparing that document. However, the list identifies requested parts rather than confirming which components have actually failed and therefore cannot be used by itself as the basis for a warranty parts order.

One of our senior Technical Support representatives, Josh, has reopened communication with the customer and is available to continue assisting with the warranty claim. Once we receive the repair shop's inspection report specifying the defective components and recommended repairs, we will promptly review it and provide the appropriate warranty parts in accordance with the warranty terms.

We encourage the customer to reply directly to Josh's most recent email so we can continue working toward a resolution as quickly as possible. We remain committed to resolving this warranty claim.

August 5 business response through BBB

Public transcript with contact details removed.

Pulsar Products appreciates the customer's additional comments and the opportunity to clarify our warranty process.

We understand the customer's frustration. However, the purpose of that exercise was to identify the correct part numbers after the failed components had been diagnosed, not to replace the diagnostic process itself. While the customer has provided a detailed parts list and supporting observations, the list does not constitute a repair diagnosis by a qualified repair facility.

Because this generator has multiple reported failures affecting several different systems, including the electric start, charging system, control panel, housing, and recoil assembly, we cannot determine which components require replacement based solely on the reported symptoms. Supplying parts without first confirming the root cause risks sending incorrect parts and may not resolve the underlying issue.

Once that inspection report is received, Pulsar will promptly review it and provide the appropriate warranty parts in accordance with the terms of the limited warranty.

  1. The customer may continue working directly with our Technical Support representative, Josh, who has been assigned to assist with this case.
  2. Once the customer reply to Josh's email from [email address removed] sent on July 23, 2026, we will work with him to identify an appropriate repair facility in his area.
  3. Warranty coverage, including any applicable labor coverage, will be determined in accordance with the terms of the limited warranty after the inspection has identified the warrantable defect or defects.
  4. Transportation arrangements, if applicable, can also be discussed once a repair facility has been identified.
  5. We appreciate the effort the customer invested in identifying part numbers. That information remains helpful for ordering purposes after the defective components have been confirmed through inspection. It was not intended to replace the inspection required under our warranty process.
  6. We understand the customer's concerns and appreciate his cooperation throughout this process. Our goal remains to repair the generator correctly by ensuring that the proper defective components are identified before warranty parts are issued.

Pulsar remains committed to resolving this warranty claim. We respectfully ask the customer to respond to Josh's email so we can coordinate the inspection and continue moving the claim toward resolution as quickly as possible.

August 5 / Lonnie's reply through BBB

Public transcript from the saved BBB case record. A phone number and location have been removed. The statements below are Lonnie's words.

Eight days of waiting, and not one of my six questions was answered. Your reply was nothing more than to go back and talk to Josh, the representative who told me in writing on July 23 that he did not have access to my case and asked me for a model number Pulsar has had since May 2025.

I am not starting over with him. Fourteen months of waiting for Pulsar to get to the bottom of this is what brought me to the BBB in the first place. We will continue here, in public, which is where Tom Irwin said he would rather deal with it, until we have this resolved.

You will not tell me who I am speaking with. You will not confirm whether labor is covered. You will not say how the generator gets to a facility or who pays for it. Fine. Set all of that aside.

One question. Your own warranty says a customer finds their nearest service dealer by calling [phone number removed]. I have been on that number for fourteen months and no one has ever given me a name. I am in [location removed]. Where do you want me to take this generator? That is your answer to give, not mine to figure out. I would appreciate not waiting another eight days for it.

Dates and status

What the record says now.

This is a manually maintained case record. The clocks advance automatically; the case status does not.

Last verified BBB portal wording"BBB is reviewing this matter."

Checked September 8, 2026. BBB said there was no action for Lonnie to take at that time. Status details

Latest documented Pulsar BBB responseAugust 5, 2026

Lonnie replied the same day, asking where to take the generator. Read the response

Latest BBB staff exchangeSeptember 22, 2026

BBB described a condition for mediation review. Lonnie asked why and renewed his repair facility request. Read both emails

Why the case moved to BBB

The move to BBB

In Tom Irwin's words.

After Lonnie escalated the parts request, Pulsar's vice president of product development replied. His email also said Pulsar reserved the right to inspect the equipment and suggested restarting with support.

Email sent July 22, 2026 at 7:42 PM Central (July 23 UTC). The exhibit uses the July 23 date.

"Your threat of a BBB complaint is likewise not helping your case. BBB follows rules, and frankly, given the tenor of your email, I'd rather deal with the case on their platform. This will, of course, additionally delay your resolution."

Tom Irwin / VP Product Development, Pulsar Products Inc.Read the full email and preceding correspondence in E01
Source documents

Primary records

Source library

Open a record to read it here, or use its document link. Public copies remove private contact details, precise locations, account references, unrelated purchases and private links.

E01 | Correspondence record, 34 pages

Emails and call transcripts covering the original return, replacement, later support request, and July escalation.

Open document

Public redacted transcript. Original attachment page numbers are preserved.

E02 | Purchase record

Public extract preserving the order date, item, seller, and generator price.

Open document

Address, payment information, order number, account totals, and unrelated purchases are omitted.

E03 | Pulsar three-year limited warranty

Warranty submitted with the BBB complaint.

Open document
E04 | PGDA70BiSCO parts diagram, 27 pages

The diagram Pulsar sent on June 18.

Open document
E05 | June 30 parts request

The submitted list separating reported repair needs from additional spare-part requests.

Open document

Public redacted transcript.

E06 | Part-number discrepancies

Differences found between the parts diagram summary and detailed pages.

Open document
E07 | September 8 BBB submission confirmation

BBB confirmed that the contact-form message was sent. This is not a response to the warranty dispute.

BBB confirms the follow-up message was successfully sent